<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some disconnected thoughts on journalism in an age of data abundance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barrysaunders.com/2009/08/journalism-in-an-age-of-data-abundance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barrysaunders.com/2009/08/journalism-in-an-age-of-data-abundance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=journalism-in-an-age-of-data-abundance</link>
	<description>For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://barrysaunders.com/2009/08/journalism-in-an-age-of-data-abundance/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barrysaunders.com/?p=166#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue that Watergate had more impact thanks to the Cold War. America&#039;s emphasis on the lack of personal freedoms - privacy - in the Soviet Union pretty much paved the way for Woodward and Bernstein. Given the need to vilify the Soviets - the administration left themselves wide open for a scandal to have that level of impact. 

A mistake they have not repeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue that Watergate had more impact thanks to the Cold War. America&#8217;s emphasis on the lack of personal freedoms &#8211; privacy &#8211; in the Soviet Union pretty much paved the way for Woodward and Bernstein. Given the need to vilify the Soviets &#8211; the administration left themselves wide open for a scandal to have that level of impact. </p>
<p>A mistake they have not repeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

